
When to buy, when to sell—some believe those are the most important decisions when selecting investments.
But far more consequential for our clients? The portfolio management protocols we use to manage your positions, all the things we might be doing in between the first purchase and the last sale.
This is called rebalancing.
Textbook rebalancing means periodically restoring a holding to a set percentage of the total portfolio value. This means adding shares when prices are lower and paring back when prices are higher. You may see these many, smaller transactions in your accounts when we go through our quarterly trading cycles.
Rebalancing is not about jumping in or out of a position. You may notice over time that we’re generally aimed at buying low and selling high within single holdings. The goal of this discipline is to try to improve overall returns of any holding across the long run—no matter when exactly we got in or when we get out.
Even clients with tenures as short as six or seven years may see holdings where the “net dollars invested” goes negative: as in, the holding has yielded more cash from the sales along the way than ever went into the purchases. And this could be true for shares that might still hold substantial value at the end of their ride.
What may be even more worthwhile, however, are those cases when our timing was “off” in the first place: when to buy. As an example, more than a decade ago our research indicated that copper production was likely to be short of global needs for many years. We identified a copper producer that was, at that time, down by two-thirds from its all-time peak. A bargain, we believed—but then it became an even better bargain.
That is to say, the stock fell. And fell. And fell.
Our outlook did not change, however. We still saw merit in our estimation about the state of copper production globally. So we bought, and bought, and bought in our rebalancing process.
By the time the stock recovered to our original purchase price, we had taken out more than we had ever invested on behalf of clients. Even a misidentified “bargain” can become a historical gain in a portfolio.
The search for good companies to buy is key to what we do. Sorting out when to eliminate a holding is also important. But the work in between—setting and adjusting our percentage allocations and rebalancing periodically to restore those allocations—is where we hope the true value of our work might emerge.
Rebalancing is a great example of the type of activity we mean when we talk about “ongoing portfolio management” and “investment research,” the things that go into our ongoing advisory work.
Rebalancing can help try to mitigate an otherwise disappointing selection, as our average cost per share declines when we add less expensive shares. And it can help us make sure we book profits if we happen to get in on a shooting star. No guarantees either way, but our protocols and discipline have the chance to make both more likely.
Clients, if you would like help reviewing your overall returns by holding in AccountView, call or email us.
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which strategies or investments may be suitable for you, consult the appropriate qualified professional prior to making a decision.
Investing involves risk including loss of principal.
No strategy assures success or protects against loss.
Rebalancing a portfolio may cause investors to incur tax liabilities and/or transaction costs and does not assure a profit or protect against a loss.
Want content like this in your inbox each week? Leave your email here.
Play the audio version of this post below:









You must be logged in to post a comment.